- Ayaz Sadiq says PAC investigation is the only way to clear Judge Naqvi’s name.
- The case is referred to PAC under Section 199 of the Rules of Procedure and Operations.
- MPs question the behavior of sitting and retired judges of the higher judiciary.
ISLAMABAD: Amid the ongoing tug-of-war between parliament and the judiciary, the National Assembly on Thursday asked the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to conduct a special audit of the accounts and sources of income of Justice Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi after allegations of corruption against him The news.
NA Vice President Zahid Akram Durrani referred the matter to the PAC at the suggestion of Economic and Political Affairs Minister Ayaz Sadiq. He had asked the deputy speaker to conduct a special audit of the judge with the help of the Auditor General of Pakistan and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR).
Sadiq had said that the Supreme Court judge should be asked to explain his source of income, how he bought a plot costing more than Rs 100 million, paid taxes on the plot deal and the source of money with which he built a house on the plot .
“This is the only way to clear the name of Justice Mazahar Naqvi,” said Ayaz Sadiq, adding that all the judges were respectable to them, but their image was tarnished by a single judge who was fingered and blocked. councils had also submitted references against him.
Sadiq said oversight of any issue was the prerogative of the NA and its committees. He said a joint team of the FBR and the Auditor General should provide a report to the PAC within 15 days of conducting a special audit.
The Chairman announced that the matter had been referred to the PAC under Rule 199 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure and Code of Conduct.
During the hearing, lawmakers also questioned the behavior of sitting and retired judges of the upper judiciary.
Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Shaikh Rohale Asghar said in a point of order that a senior lawyer, who later became a Supreme Court judge, provided assistance to his former client. He urged the federal government to look into the case as it involved judge misconduct.
Justice Naqvi was sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice in 2020 in the seat that became vacant following the retirement of Asif Saeed Khosa.
The Supreme Court judge is under investigation following an audio leak involving him. In the alleged audio, former Punjab Prime Minister Parvez Elahi could be heard talking about the administration of courts.
In March, the Secretary General of the PML-N Advocate Forum, Zahid Hussain Malik, and the Pakistan Bar Association also filed a petition against the judge.
Subsequently, other bar associations of the countries also filed a complaint against the judge.
However, Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial has yet to convene a meeting of the SJC on the matter.
Two of the apex court’s senior judges, Judge Qazi Faez Isa and Judge Sardar Tariq Masood, had urged the CJP in April to convene a meeting of the SJC to review the misconduct complaints filed against Judge Naqvi, to investigate.
#Raises #Bar #Judiciary #Asks #PAC #Audit #Judges #Assets